Arkansas Ban on Political Robocalls Struck Down

July 29, 2016

robocallA federal judge for the District Court in Little Rock, Arkansas ruled this week that a 1981 State law banning political robocalls is unconstitutional.    The ruling comes less than a year after a federal court overturned a similar state law ban in South Carolina.

Why did the Court find the robocall ban unconstitutional?

The robocall ban in Arkansas was struck down because it does not going far enough with respect to restricting automated calls to consumers.  Instead of banning all autodialed calls, without regard to their content, the law ran afoul of the Constitution by specifying that only certain kinds of calls were banned, such as political robocalls, while allowing others, such as those placed by charities.   The Judge ultimately ruled that the privacy interests of consumers (in being protected from unwanted, intrusive speech in their homes) was not compelling enough to justify singling out the forms of speech otherwise restricted by the ban.  Accordingly, the entire law was deemed constitutionally invalid.

Protect Your Business From Robocall-Related Liability

We have blogged extensively about increased regulatory and judicial interest in the practice of autodialing, as well as telemarketing in general.  Given recent rulings, we are approaching a scenario whereby states turn to blanket bans on the use of autodialers, in order to pass constitutional muster.  Nevertheless, in today’s regulatory environment, it is imperative to have telemarketing practices and procedures examined by experienced counsel prior to embarking on any telemarketing campaign.

If you are interested in learning more about this topic, need to review your telemarketing practices and procedures or if you are facing an investigation from a regulatory agency, please e-mail us at info@kleinmoynihan.com, or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for information purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney.  Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Attorney Advertising

FCC Calls for “Strike Force’ To Combat Robocalls

FCC To Rigorously Enforce TCPA Political Robocall Text Message Regulations

FTC Wins Robocall Blocking Technology Lawsuit With Contest Rules

Share:

David Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes, and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.
fat guy with a pen in his mouth like a toothpick typing on his laptop at a desk ARL lawsuits

ARL Lawsuits on the Rise

We have seen an increase in lawsuits alleging automatic renewal law (“ARL”) violations in the State of California. Because our readers may not be familiar

Read More »

Trending Topics

fat guy with a pen in his mouth like a toothpick typing on his laptop at a desk ARL lawsuits
Blog

ARL Lawsuits on the Rise

We have seen an increase in lawsuits alleging automatic renewal law (“ARL”) violations in the State of California. Because our readers may not be familiar

Read More »
guy on computer in yellow shirt CCPA opt out
Blog

Take CCPA Opt-Outs Seriously!

California’s consumer data privacy law affords consumers the right to prevent companies from selling and sharing their personal information. The California Privacy Protection Agency (“CPPA”) is charged with enforcing the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”), including its opt-out rules (“CCPA Opt-Out

Read More »