Alarm.com Can’t Escape TCPA Lawsuit

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

October 24, 2017

tcpa-lawsuit
TCPA Lawsuit

A federal court recently rejected Alarm.com’s efforts to have claims against it dismissed in a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) lawsuit.   The TCPA lawsuit against Alarm.com seeks redress for alleged aggravation and intrusion of privacy resulting from the receipt of more than 75 Alarm.com product-related calls.

What were the allegations contained in the Alarm.com TCPA lawsuit?

The plaintiff alleged that she received calls from a variety of third party dealers attempting to sell her an Alarm.com wireless home security system.  She further alleged that: (1) the calls were placed without her prior express consent; (2) the calls included prerecorded messages; (3) the calls were received despite the fact that she had placed her number on the Do-Not-Call Registry; and (4) the calls persisted even after she informed several representatives not to call her again.  Importantly, however, the plaintiff acknowledged that she never received calls directly from Alarm.com.  Nevertheless, she alleged that Alarm.com was liable for the alleged TCPA violations by virtue of its retaining the contractual right to discipline, and terminate its relationship with, the respective third-party dealers.   Alarm.com moved the court to dismiss the claims against it because the plaintiff had failed to allege sufficient facts to claim that Alarm.com was liable for the conduct of the subject telemarketers.   In rejecting this argument, however, the Court held that advertisers may be held vicariously liable for the TCPA-violative acts of their agents.

Protect Yourself Against TCPA Lawsuits

As this TCPA lawsuit demonstrates, it is critical for businesses to understand the scope of the TCPA and its implementing regulations.  Alarm.com sought to distance itself from liability for the alleged TCPA violations because it did not place the subject phone calls itself.  However, the court was not persuaded and explained that liability will extend to sellers when they are able to exercise a degree of control over the entities placing calls on their behalf.  Given the staggering exposure to liability that companies face in today’s TCPA-regulatory environment, it is imperative to have telemarketing practices and procedures examined by experienced counsel in order to mitigate risk.

If you are interested in learning more about this topic or need to review your telemarketing practices or marketing partner agreements, please e-mail us at info@kleinmoynihan.com, or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney.  Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Attorney Advertising

Hooters Settles TCPA Lawsuit

DePaul University Loses Spokeo-Based Challenge to TCPA Lawsuit

Twilio Narrowly Avoids TCPA Lawsuit Liability

David O. Klein

David O. Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the telemarketing, technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.

Schedule a Call
In The Know

Trending Topics

Creating a Viral and Legally Compliant "Pin to Win" Contest- Klein Moynihan Turco

Creating a Viral (And Legally Compliant) “Pin to Win” Contest

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

We have frequently written about the marketing benefits associated with the use of promotional contests and sweepstakes.  Promotional contests and sweepstakes often appear on social media platforms, which provide companies with a free and effective means to increase the number of consumers participating in their respective contests. While companies must

Facebook Decision defines a TCPA Autodialer- Klein Moynihan Turco LLP

Facebook Aftermath: Courts Clarify Definition of TCPA Autodialer

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

On April 1st, the U.S. Supreme Court released its opinion in Facebook, Inc. v. Duguid, marking a newly clarified definition of “autodialer” within the meaning of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”). In the two weeks that followed, two federal courts have directly addressed the definition of TCPA autodialer as

Critical Role that TCPA Plays in Outbound Telemarketing- KMT

The Critical Role that the TCPA Plays in Outbound Telemarketing

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

If you’re running any sort of outbound telemarketing campaign – phone calls, voicemail drops, or text messaging – you need to understand the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) and its enabling regulations. Call center operators are not the only businesses that employ outbound telemarketing to reach out to consumers. Using

How to Use Promotional Marketing the Legal Way: Klein Moynihan Turco LLP

How To Use Promotional Marketing The Legal Way

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The use of promotional contests, games and sweepstakes marketing can be a dynamic and cost-effective way to increase sales, build a database of interested consumers and otherwise increase brand awareness and buzz. Consumers are more easily attracted to your marketing message by the opportunity to win prizes than with more

Running a Telemarketing Business?

Get a Free Compliance Review From an Experienced TCPA Lawyer.

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin