United States Supreme Court Refuses to Hear New Jersey Sports Gambling Appeal

A New Jersey State law that would legalize sports gambling in Atlantic City casinos suffered its final blow yesterday when the United States Supreme Court declined to hear New Jersey’s appeal from the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, which had affirmed a lower court ruling that found the law to be illegal.

Previous Decision

In 2013, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey struck down New Jersey’s sports gambling law on the grounds that it was inconsistent with federal law.  Specifically, the proposed 2012 New Jersey State sports gambling law was held to be in direct conflict with the 1992 federal Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA).  As we first informed our readers in the blog New Jersey Governor Christie Loses Appeal to Legalize Sports Gambling, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of the lower district court and stated that:

We are cognizant that certain questions related to this case — whether gambling on sporting events is harmful to the games’ integrity and whether states should be permitted to license and profit from the activity — . . . .  But we are not asked to judge the wisdom of PASPA or of New Jersey’s law, or of the desirability of the activities they seek to regulate. We speak only to the legality of these measures as a matter of constitutional law. . . . New Jersey’s sports wagering law conflicts with PASPA and, under our Constitution, must yield.

Supreme Court Refuses to Hear New Jersey Sports Gambling Appeal

Despite a strong dissent from one of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals judges, the United States Supreme Court declined to hear New Jersey’s appeal.  A number of amici briefs were submitted encouraging the Supreme Court to let the lower court decision stand, including those from the United States government, the National Collegiate Athletic Association, the National Football League, the National Basketball Association, the National Hockey League and Major League Baseball, respectfully.  Ultimately, at least five (5) justices of the Supreme Court decided that the Third Circuit Court of Appeals decision did not need review.

Impact of Decision

The Supreme Court’s decision not to hear New Jersey’s appeal is further indication that unless a state has been “grandfathered” in under the PASPA, the state will not be allowed to legalize sports gambling within its borders.

If you are interested in learning more about this topic or pursuing an online fantasy sports gaming venture, please e-mail us at info@kleinmoynihan.com, or call us at (212) 246-0900.

The material contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney.  Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney.

Attorney Advertising

Share:

David Klein

David Klein is one of the most recognized attorneys in the technology, Internet marketing, sweepstakes, and telecommunications fields. Skilled at counseling clients on a broad range of technology-related matters, David Klein has substantial experience in negotiating and drafting complex licensing, marketing and Internet agreements.
person on shopify website wiretapping claim

Favorable CIPA Wiretapping Claim Decision

As our readers know, lawsuits alleging illegal wiretapping claims against companies that collect consumers’ data continue unabated. Below, we discuss a recent favorable ruling dismissing California Invasion of Privacy

Read More »
close up of the letter AI for artificial intelligence AI calls

AI Telemarketing Calls

Readers of this blog know that the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) declared that telemarketing calls utilizing artificial intelligence (“AI”) are subject to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act’s (“TCPA”) restrictions on “artificial or prerecorded

Read More »

Trending Topics

Trending Topics

person on shopify website wiretapping claim
Blog

Favorable CIPA Wiretapping Claim Decision

As our readers know, lawsuits alleging illegal wiretapping claims against companies that collect consumers’ data continue unabated. Below, we discuss a recent favorable ruling dismissing California Invasion of Privacy

Read More »
close up of the letter AI for artificial intelligence AI calls
Blog

AI Telemarketing Calls

Readers of this blog know that the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) declared that telemarketing calls utilizing artificial intelligence (“AI”) are subject to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act’s (“TCPA”) restrictions on “artificial or prerecorded

Read More »
phone on table with reflection opt out tcpa telemarketing
Blog

New Effective Date for TCPA Opt-Out Rule!

Although originally adopted on February 16, 2024, the Federal Communications Commission again has decided to delay the effective date of its opt-out regulation until January 31, 2027. We discuss the reasoning for the most recent delay below.   TCPA Opt-Out Regulation Delayed, Again 

Read More »